前言
本篇将速拓云湖北十堰IPv6型（2 核 2G）与腾讯云服务器（下称 CVM）进行对比实测。具体流程见《服务器对比实测评分方案》。
测试服务器
测试服务器由速拓云提供。
| 产品信息 |
|---|
| 产品名称 | 湖北十堰IPv6型 |
| CPU | E5-2686 V4*2（2核） |
| 内存 | DDR4（2G） |
| IP | 仅提供IPv6不提供IPv4 |
| 流出带宽 | 峰值5Mbps |
| 流入带宽 | 峰值100Mbps |
| 标价 | 6.66元/月 |
| | CPU 信息 |
|---|
| Model name | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2686 v4 @ 2.30GHz |
| Vendor ID | GenuineIntel |
| Architecture | x86_64 |
| CPU op-mode(s) | 32-bit, 64-bit |
| Address sizes | 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual |
| CPU(s) | 2 |
| CPU family | 6 |
| Model | 79 |
| Thread(s) per core | 1 |
| Core(s) per socket | 2 |
| Socket(s) | 1 |
| Stepping | 1 |
| BogoMIPS | 4599.99 |
| L1d cache | 32 KiB (1 instance) |
| L1i cache | 32 KiB (1 instance) |
| L2 cache | 256 KiB (1 instance) |
| L3 cache | 45 MiB (1 instance) |
| Virtualization | VT-x |
| Hypervisor vendor | KVM |
| Virtualization type | full |
测试结果
图片处理测试结果
图片压缩
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| JPG 449K | 0.0799s | 0.0466s | ✗✗✗✗ |
| JPG 1.9M | 0.2554s | 0.1676s | ✗✗✗ |
| PNG 750K | 0.5511s | 0.4122s | ✗✗ |
| PNG 3.8M | 0.6631s | 0.4824s | ✗✗ |
| BMP 1.5M | 0.0211s | 0.0130s | ✗✗✗ |
| BMP 6.0M | 0.0736s | 0.0393s | ✗✗✗✗ |
生成缩略图
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| JPG 449K | 0.0554s | 0.0360s | ✗✗✗ |
| JPG 1.9M | 0.1791s | 0.1296s | ✗✗ |
| PNG 750K | 0.0860s | 0.0560s | ✗✗✗ |
| PNG 3.8M | 0.1240s | 0.0864s | ✗✗✗ |
| BMP 1.5M | 0.0354s | 0.0203s | ✗✗✗✗ |
| BMP 6.0M | 0.0448s | 0.0262s | ✗✗✗✗ |
| GIF 417K | 0.0961s | 0.0672s | ✗✗✗ |
| GIF 1.8M | 0.3942s | 0.2773s | ✗✗✗ |
生成 WebP
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| JPG 449K | 0.4379s | 0.3062s | ✗✗✗ |
| JPG 1.9M | 1.4948s | 1.0643s | ✗✗ |
| PNG 750K | 0.1417s | 0.1008s | ✗✗ |
| PNG 3.8M | 0.4394s | 0.3095s | ✗✗✗ |
| BMP 1.5M | 0.0796s | 0.0545s | ✗✗✗ |
| BMP 6.0M | 0.3040s | 0.2096s | ✗✗✗ |
| GIF 417K | 0.4271s | 0.2887s | ✗✗✗ |
| GIF 1.8M | 0.8905s | 0.6153s | ✗✗✗ |
音频处理测试结果
生成 OGG
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| MP3 137K | 0.4315s | 0.2928s | ✗✗✗ |
| MP3 939K | 1.6600s | 1.1947s | ✗✗ |
| MP3 5.2M | 8.5324s | 6.4211s | ✗✗ |
视频处理测试结果
视频压缩
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| MP4 2.4M | 11.0356s | 12.7703s | ✓ |
| MP4 9.4M | 0.1462s | 0.0917s | ✗✗✗ |
| MOV 7.7M | 8.8184s | 9.4417s | ✓ |
| MOV 29M | 25.7076s | 29.2054s | ✓ |
生成缩略图
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| MP4 2.4M | 0.5009s | 0.3297s | ✗✗✗ |
| MP4 9.4M | 0.4413s | 0.2952s | ✗✗✗ |
| MOV 7.7M | 3.8763s | 3.6489s | ✗ |
| MOV 29M | 10.4883s | 11.1678s | ✓ |
生成 WebM
| 文件 | 耗时 | CVM 耗时 | 性能对比 |
|---|
| MP4 2.4M | 71.0290s | 79.7153s | ✓ |
| MP4 9.4M | 68.2853s | 72.3739s | ✓ |
| MOV 7.7M | 61.1864s | 71.5808s | ✓ |
| MOV 29M | 261.9216s | 317.8199s | ✓✓ |
性能评分
| 分类 | 得分 |
|---|
| 图片处理性能 | 66.69 |
| 音频处理性能 | 71.70 |
| 视频处理性能 | 99.08 |
| 综合处理性能 | 76.05 |